These days, political news is following the issues and news signals about Barjam with a lot of focus. The question for all is whether the ground will be prepared for the countries to return to the BRICS agreement or whether these negotiations will be fruitless. The second meeting was held in a situation where hopes for the return of the United States and Iran to the UN Security Council have doubled. But some believe that these talks will not yield results in the short term. If this note is important to you, we suggest that you follow this analysis to the end.
*** Start the pulse of Barjam again
The question is, where did the issue of the possibility of reviving Borjam become serious? After the Iran-China trade agreement, the United States entered the game for fear that the Middle East would fall into the hands of the Chinese. A State Department spokesman said without elaborating that his country was ready to lift sanctions that were incompatible with the Iran nuclear deal and that the powers would revive the UN Security Council. Ned Price recently made it clear in the Vienna talks that “we are ready to take the necessary steps to return to the UNHCR commitments, including the lifting of sanctions that are inconsistent with the UNHCR Comprehensive Plan of Action.”
*** Reflection of Iraqi views in the new round of talks
In the second session of the face-to-face and official talks between the Iranian and American governments, Mr. Araghchi’s views were reflected more than those of other politicians. At this meeting, Araqchi, while emphasizing Iran’s will to continue serious interactions, stated that this is subject to the observation of political will and seriousness on the other side, otherwise there will be no reason to continue negotiations. He has stated in part that Iran has no step-by-step process for lifting US sanctions imposed during the Trump administration.
*** American offer; Step-by-step removal of sanctions
Khatibzadeh has also stated his position on the Americans’ request for a gradual lifting of Trump’s sanctions, saying that these conditions are unbearable and unjustifiable for Iran. He stressed the need to lift all US sanctions. “The definitive policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is the lifting of all US sanctions, whether the sanctions that Trump re-imposed after leaving the UN Security Council or the sanctions that he initiated, as well as the sanctions that have been imposed under any other heading. “
*** Description of the Borjam process by the Supreme Leader of Iran
The Iranian leader recently outlined a process in which the United States must first lift all sanctions in order for Iran to fully resume implementation of the UN Security Council. This process is a path that Iran will consider as the final chapter of the results of the meetings and will certainly adhere to its clause. Therefore, it is the American side that must decide whether it is willing to cooperate on the conditions mentioned by Iran or not. This issue can greatly shorten this round of talks, because Iran has defined the scope of Borjam in this round of talks and will not be satisfied with less than that.
*** Lifting all sanctions; Iran’s red line in Barjam
Suffice it to look at part of what Mr. Araqchi said: The first policy and process in Burjam is that the Americans should lift all sanctions. After that, Iran will confirm whether the US operational path is a framework of trust. If the sanctions are lifted, we will return to our commitments. We will return without any problems. This is a clear policy. We do not consider American promises valid. If they say that they take them on paper, it is of no use. What is needed is action! They must lift the sanctions in practice. Subsequently, we will confirm their statements to ensure that the sanctions are lifted. Then, we will resume our commitments.
*** Analyzes regarding the future trend of Barjam
According to the rumors, it is inferred that Iran has set the course in this round of negotiations and is practically not willing to waste time on negotiations other than this process. This view is also logical from several points of view. Iran’s economy is heavily based on the dollar because of its dependence on US decisions. Many markets are waiting for the news of the nuclear deal. This recession in the market is hurting the economy. Therefore, the negotiation process should not be prolonged. Prolonged this trend will cause double problems for the Iranian economy.
*** US efforts to change the provisions of Barjam
The remarks made by the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman were in response to allegations by US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Jalina Porter about a scheduled meeting of representatives of Iran and other countries in Vienna on Tuesday to discuss the 2015 nuclear deal. . Porter said Friday that the discussion will focus on “the nuclear measures that Iran needs to take to return to compliance with the IAEA Board.” In these negotiations, US officials took place while British, German, French, Chinese and Russian officials were meeting with Iran, and Iran was practically missing an opportunity.
*** Qualitative evaluation of the Barjam talks in Vienna
In terms of the quality of meetings and its formality in Vienna, it can be said that this meeting was held with the highest quality and formality. The meeting, chaired by one of the EU’s top diplomats, Enrique Mora, was attended by representatives of China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom and Iran at the level of deputy foreign ministers and political leaders. In such a case, if the motivation of all participants is a consensus on one issue, we will see that in one meeting we can go through a one-year course of negotiations and reach a conclusion Americans are different, and that will prolong the negotiation process..
*** Americans have little time to revive Barjam
During the meeting, participants discussed the possibility of a US return to the UN Security Council, according to a statement issued by the Iranian Foreign Ministry after the meeting. It seems that the time for the American side to negotiate meaningfully and effectively with Iran is coming to an end. Some experts believe that in the upcoming presidential election in Iran, power will most likely be in the hands of the extremist faction, which means that the negotiation process will stop. Therefore, according to the joint ministerial statement, the participants recognized the possibility of a full return of the United States to the UN Security Council and reaffirmed their readiness to address the issue positively in a joint effort.
*** Tactical look at nuclear diplomacy
A tactical view of nuclear diplomacy can create more benefits for countries. Iran, for example, has stated that Iran will suspend its modifiable nuclear actions immediately after the lifting of sanctions. This is a tactical policy to announce the issue and benchmark the other side. It seems that the previously announced policies of Iran and the United States are merely tactical measures to gain more concessions, and now Tehran and Washington are moving towards more realistic conditions.
*** The way to agreement is open for the parties
There is no need to negotiate for the United States to return to BRICS, because it is quite clear how the United States can return. Iran has put its good faith to the test in the past. Robert Mali is also trying to pursue such an idea in the Iran-US communication space for the future of regional security. That is why it will be possible to provide financial incentives in relation to Iran.
*** The effectiveness of Barjam must be validated
Iran has said there is no need for new talks on a US return to the nuclear deal. In addition, Iran has explicitly stated that any action by Iran to fully resume compliance with the UN Security Council would require the United States to lift all sanctions. Although Rouhani government officials have always emphasized the desirability and effectiveness of Borjam, the delay in ending sanctions and resuming new challenges in Iran’s relations with the great powers shows that the concept of honesty and unilateral commitment can never lead to lasting benefits for national security.
The United States seeks to prolong the nuclear negotiation process. This issue is debatable in several ways. Prolonged negotiations will cause more crises in Iran’s economy. On the other hand, the United States is seeking an agreement with the new Iranian government in order to gain more stability from the results of these negotiations. On the other hand, the United States is not yet fully aware of the terms of the Iran-China agreement and therefore prefers more information Gained. Therefore, it will not make a heavy deal in the short term. The Iranian side must act smartly in these negotiations.
این مطلب بدون برچسب می باشد.