In the current situation, Barjam is not in a good situation. The United States has done the most damage to the body of this international agreement, and European countries have also taken a passive approach to non-fulfillment of their obligations. New Iran and the United States are very important. Join us in this memo to describe the Europeans’ attitude towards BRICS and the future of this international treaty.
The current situation of Barjam is in a situation that has been unprecedented in its last three years. Many countries have violated the text and spirit of this agreement and dragged the game to deviant roads. The crucial six months ahead will determine the criteria and dimensions of the new nuclear deal; Because after announcing Biden’s final victory, Washington will enter a new era. This period is very important for US foreign policy for Iran.
*** Europe welcomes Barjam with more points
The Europeans welcome the nature of Barjam because it serves their interests more than the United States. The United States has also given the green light for the implementation of Barjam, which, of course, can not be relied on with confidence. Many seek to breathe new life into White House politics. In such a situation, the Europeans are trying to put pressure on Iran in addition to profiting from Barjam, and to gain more concessions from Iran in the economic field for trade with Iran.
Regarding the latest official meetings and talks between the member countries of the UN Security Council, the meeting of the Joint Commission of the Comprehensive Joint Action Plan of the UN Security Council was held for the last time on Wednesday, September 16 in the form of a video conference. According to the provisions of Barjam, the Joint Commission is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the agreement. The Joint Commission, chaired by the Secretary-General of the Foreign Action Service, Helga Maria Schmidt, was chaired by EU High Representative Joseph Borrell and included representatives from China, France, Germany, Russia, Britain and Iran at the level of Deputy Foreign Ministers.
*** Some European countries support Saudi Arabia and Israel
Issues raised in order to maintain order in this conference that Iran has achieved to achieve this goal depends on the cooperation of Europeans. However, some European countries support the interests of Israel and Saudi Arabia and strongly welcome the extension of the UN Security Council. These conditions have created a situation for the Europeans that has both guaranteed their political security and brought them many economic benefits from the Middle East route.
The ethics of Europeans on the subject had been the focus of many political analysts from day one, and no more was expected of the current situation. At home, there is little hope for Europe. Even among the young and well-informed people in the field of economics, there is a degree of despair and frustration. Unfortunately, Europe has been reluctant to launch a financial exchange approach, paving the way for the United States to block Iran’s foreign assets. In the current situation, it is not possible to pay attention to the requests of these countries and see the solutions of these countries in the interests of Iran.
*** Bank transfer in Iran and Europe
In the case of bank transfers, the EU can commission one of the existing European banks or a new bank to conduct financial transactions with Iran. Naturally, the problem with the US sanctions structure is that the bank itself will probably be sanctioned immediately.
There was a very simple way to advance financial transactions between Iran and Europe that had no bureaucracy and wasted time to set it up. The method was very simple. It was enough for the other interested parties to be forced to work with such a bank. For example, the bank accounts of US ambassadors and diplomatic staff in Europe should be transferred to this bank! Or European governments make their payments to international contracting companies solely through this bank. Such mechanisms can be similarly designed for other sectors of the economy that have been targeted by sanctions, the details of which will be provided to local officials, God willing.
*** Reasons for European inaction in not implementing Barjam’s achievements
The reasons for the Europeans’ inaction in not implementing Barjam’s achievements are not a complex issue that needs to be analyzed. The Europeans could not stand against the United States, and generally the Iranian market and the Iranian economy are not attractive enough to persuade the European side to act against the will of the United States. Certainly, in terms of prestige, it needs to maintain order and confront Washington’s unilateralism in the Donald Trump era.
In the current situation, Europe is under a lot of pressure in terms of performance in Barjam. If Barjam is completely eliminated, Europe will feel the most consequences after Iran. Certainly, tensions between Iran and Europe will enter their depreciating path. This is all the more important as there is growing criticism these days of European passivity in the face of American unilateralism.
*** The behavior of Europeans regarding Barjam
All of this has led many analysts to conclude that Europe must step out of its passivity in the current context and show its goodwill to Iran. One of his election slogans is to return to This is the Barjam agreement, while the Europeans can still present this issue as their achievement in the current situation. For this reason, many European politicians see the defense of Barjam as a golden opportunity to strike a balance between Europe and the United States.
Europeans feel security risks regarding Barjam. These countries are in danger due to Iran’s progress in the production and development of their ballistic missiles and feel that by creating a gap between Iran and Europe, Iran will reveal its hidden options. On the other hand, any crisis in the Middle East, such as the refugee crisis, affects Europe because of its geographical proximity, not the United States.
این مطلب بدون برچسب می باشد.